The objective of the course is to encourage the reflection on the interpersonal relationship, declined in the mode of love, care and gift, or on the contrary, of domination and violence. It also intends to show the importance of a clear and truthful communication, both in interpersonal relationships and with regard to the community.
The educational objectives of the course (according to the Dublin descriptors) are the following:
1. Knowledge and understanding: the critical understanding of the main concepts of ethics of relationship, both in their historical development and in the theoretical dimension and in connections with other disciplines and research fields (psychology, literature, education sciences). For this reason the course aims to: 1. Retrace the salient moments of the development of ethical reflection; 2. Analyze the main concepts of ethics of relationship: love, gift, forgiveness, care.
2. Ability to apply knowledge: 1) ability to use bibliographic tools and reference works for understanding texts; 2) ability to apply text reading methods.
3. Autonomy of judgment: ability to formulate a reasoned judgment on issues related to interpersonal relationships; establish relationship between ethics and educational sciences; identify the ethical principles that characterize the responsibility of communication in professional and social life.
4. Acquisition of communication skills: to practice philosophical discussion as an exercise of respectful dialogue and critical argumentation.
The educational objectives of the course (according to the Dublin descriptors) are the following:
1. Knowledge and understanding: the critical understanding of the main concepts of ethics of relationship, both in their historical development and in the theoretical dimension and in connections with other disciplines and research fields (psychology, literature, education sciences). For this reason the course aims to: 1. Retrace the salient moments of the development of ethical reflection; 2. Analyze the main concepts of ethics of relationship: love, gift, forgiveness, care.
2. Ability to apply knowledge: 1) ability to use bibliographic tools and reference works for understanding texts; 2) ability to apply text reading methods.
3. Autonomy of judgment: ability to formulate a reasoned judgment on issues related to interpersonal relationships; establish relationship between ethics and educational sciences; identify the ethical principles that characterize the responsibility of communication in professional and social life.
4. Acquisition of communication skills: to practice philosophical discussion as an exercise of respectful dialogue and critical argumentation.
scheda docente
materiale didattico
b) Relational virtues: gratefulness, friendship, pietas, sincerity
c) Martin Buber's philosophy of dialogue and the educational relationship
d) Philosophical theories on love
e) Love and the flourishing of the human person according to Josef Pieper
A. MILAN, Educare all'Incontro. La pedagogia di Martin Buber, 2021
M. SCHOEPFLIN, L’amore secondo i filosofi, Città Nuova (available on formonline, as out of stock)
J. PIEPER, Sull’amore, Morcelliana, Brescia 2012
Programma
a) You and me: human person as a relational beingb) Relational virtues: gratefulness, friendship, pietas, sincerity
c) Martin Buber's philosophy of dialogue and the educational relationship
d) Philosophical theories on love
e) Love and the flourishing of the human person according to Josef Pieper
Testi Adottati
F. RUSSO, Antropologia filosofica. Persona,libertà,relazionalità, EDUSC, Roma 2021A. MILAN, Educare all'Incontro. La pedagogia di Martin Buber, 2021
M. SCHOEPFLIN, L’amore secondo i filosofi, Città Nuova (available on formonline, as out of stock)
J. PIEPER, Sull’amore, Morcelliana, Brescia 2012
Modalità Erogazione
-Frontal lessons - Individual and group exercises - Case analysis -Videos, documentaries and moviesModalità Frequenza
Non-obligatory attendanceModalità Valutazione
The examination consists of a written test, consisting of 6-8 questions closed-ended and 4-6 questions open-ended. The examination grade will be awarded in thirtieths. The duration of the test is 60 minutes For attending students, any group work carried out in the classroom and a mid-course qualifying test will also form part of the assessment with a mark equivalent to 15% of the final score. Ratings: 30 cum laude: excellent, solid knowledge, excellent expressive skills, complete understanding of concepts and topics. 30: very good, complete and adequate knowledge, correct and well articulated expression skills. 27-29: good, satisfactory knowledge, essentially correct ability of expression. 24-26: knowledge fairly good, but not complete and not always correct. 21-23: knowledge generally good but superficial. Expression often not appropriate. 18-21: sufficient.